SPSS generates quite a few tables in its output from a two-way ANOVA. In this section, we show you the main tables required to understand your results from the two-way ANOVA, including descriptives, between-subjects effects, Tukey post hoc tests (multiple comparisons), a plot of the results, and how to write up these results.

For a complete explanation of the output you have to interpret when checking your data for the six assumptions required to carry out a two-way ANOVA, see our enhanced guide. This includes relevant boxplots, and output from your Shapiro-Wilk test for normality and test for homogeneity of variances.

Finally, if you have a statistically significant interaction, you will also need to report simple main effects. Alternately, if you do not have a statistically significant interaction, there are other procedures you will have to follow. We show you these procedures in SPSS, as well as how to interpret and write up your results in our enhanced two-way ANOVA guide.

Below, we take you through each of the main tables required to understand your results from the two-way ANOVA.

Join the 1,000s of students, academics and professionals who rely on Laerd Statistics.
TAKE THE TOUR
PLANS & PRICING

You can find appropriate descriptive statistics for when you report the results of your two-way ANOVA in the aptly named "**Descriptive Statistics**" table, as shown below:

Published with written permission from SPSS, IBM Corporation.

This table is very useful because it provides the mean and standard deviation for each combination of the groups of the independent variables (what is sometimes referred to as each "cell" of the design). In addition, the table provides "Total" rows, which allows means and standard deviations for groups only split by one independent variable, or none at all, to be known. This might be more useful if you do not have a statistically significant interaction.

The plot of the mean "interest in politics" score for each combination of groups of "Gender" and "Edu_level" are plotted in a line graph, as shown below:

Published with written permission from SPSS, IBM Corporation.

Although this graph is probably not of sufficient quality to present in your reports (you can edit its look in SPSS), it does tend to provide a good graphical illustration of your results. An interaction effect can usually be seen as a set of non-parallel lines. You can see from this graph that the lines do not appear to be parallel (with the lines actually crossing). You might expect there to be a statistically significant interaction, which we can confirm in the next section.

The actual result of the two-way ANOVA – namely, whether either of the two independent variables or their interaction are statistically significant – is shown in the **Tests of Between-Subjects Effects** table, as shown below:

Published with written permission from SPSS, IBM Corporation.

The particular rows we are interested in are the "Gender", "Edu_Level" and "Gender*Edu_Level" rows, and these are highlighted above. These rows inform us whether our independent variables (the "Gender" and "Edu_Level" rows) and their interaction (the "Gender*Edu_Level" row) have a statistically significant effect on the dependent variable, "interest in politics". It is important to first look at the "Gender*Edu_Level" interaction as this will determine how you can interpret your results (see our enhanced guide for more information). You can see from the "**Sig.**" column that we have a statistically significant interaction at the *p* = .014 level. You may also wish to report the results of "Gender" and "Edu_Level", but again, these need to be interpreted in the context of the interaction result. We can see from the above table that there was no statistically significant difference in mean interest in politics between males and females (*p* = .207), but there were statistically significant differences between educational levels (*p* < .0005).

When you have a **statistically significant interaction**, reporting the **main effects** can be misleading. Therefore, you will need to report the **simple main effects**. In our example, this would involve determining the mean difference in interest in politics between genders at each educational level, as well as between educational level for each gender. Unfortunately, SPSS does not allow you to do this using the graphical interface you will be familiar with, but requires you to use syntax. Therefore, in our enhanced two-way ANOVA guide, we show you the procedure for doing this in SPSS, as well as explaining how to interpret and write up the output from your simple main effects.

When you **do not** have a statistically significant interaction, we explain two options you have, as well as a procedure you can use in SPSS to deal with this issue.

If you do not have a statistically significant interaction, you might interpret the Tukey post hoc test results for the different levels of education, which can be found in the **Multiple Comparisons** table, as shown below:

Published with written permission from SPSS, IBM Corporation.

You can see from the above table that there is some repetition of the results, but regardless of which row we choose to read from, we are interested in the differences between (1) School and College, (2) School and University, and (3) College and University. From the results, we can see that there is a statistically significant difference between all three different educational levels (*p* < .0005).

You should emphasize the results from the interaction first, before you mention the main effects. For example, you might report the result as:

- General

A two-way ANOVA was conducted that examined the effect of gender and education level on interest in politics. There was a statistically significant interaction between the effects of gender and education level on interest in politics, *F *(2, 54) = 4.643, *p* = .014.

If you had a statistically significant interaction term and carried out the procedure for simple main effects in SPSS, you would also report these results. Briefly, you might report these as:

- General

Simple main effects analysis showed that males were significantly more interested in politics than females when educated to university level (*p* = .002), but there were no differences between gender when educated to school (*p* = .465) or college level (*p* = .793).

In our enhanced two-way ANOVA guide, we show you how to write up the results from your assumptions tests and two-way ANOVA procedure, including simple main effects, if you need to report this in a dissertation/thesis, assignment or research report. We do this using the Harvard and APA styles. You can learn more about our enhanced content here.