SPSS generates quite a few tables in its one-way ANOVA analysis. In this section, we show you only the main tables required to understand your results from the one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests. For a complete explanation of the output you have to interpret when checking your data for the six assumptions required to carry out a one-way ANOVA, see our enhanced guide here. This includes relevant boxplots, and output from your Shapiro-Wilk test for normality and test for homogeneity of variances. Also, if your data failed the assumption of homogeneity of variances, we take you through the results for Welch ANOVA, which you will have to interpret rather than the standard one-way ANOVA in this guide. Below, we focus on the descriptives table, as well as the results for the one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test only. We will go through each table in turn.

Join the 1,000s of students, academics and professionals who rely on Laerd Statistics.
TAKE THE TOUR
PLANS & PRICING

The descriptives table (see below) provides some very useful descriptive statistics, including the mean, standard deviation and 95% confidence intervals for the dependent variable (Time) for each separate group (Beginners, Intermediate and Advanced), as well as when all groups are combined (Total). These figures are useful when you need to describe your data.

Published with written permission from SPSS, IBM Corporation.

This is the table that shows the output of the ANOVA analysis and whether we have a statistically significant difference between our group means. We can see that the significance level is 0.021 (*p* = .021), which is below 0.05. and, therefore, there is a statistically significant difference in the mean length of time to complete the spreadsheet problem between the different courses taken. This is great to know, but we do not know which of the specific groups differed. Luckily, we can find this out in the **Multiple Comparisons Table** which contains the results of post-hoc tests.

Published with written permission from SPSS, IBM Corporation.

From the results so far, we know that there are significant differences between the groups as a whole. The table below, Multiple Comparisons, shows which groups differed from each other. The Tukey post-hoc test is generally the preferred test for conducting post-hoc tests on a one-way ANOVA, but there are many others. We can see from the table below that there is a significant difference in time to complete the problem between the group that took the beginner course and the intermediate course (*p* = 0.046), as well as between the beginner course and advanced course (*p* = 0.034). However, there were no differences between the groups that took the intermediate and advanced course (*p* = 0.989).

Published with written permission from SPSS, IBM Corporation.

Based on the results above, we could report the results of the study as follows (N.B., this does not include the results from your assumptions tests or effect size calculations):

- General

There was a statistically significant difference between groups as determined by one-way ANOVA (*F*(2,27) = 4.467, *p* = .021). A Tukey post-hoc test revealed that the time to complete the problem was statistically significantly lower after taking the intermediate (23.6 ± 3.3 min, *p* = .046) and advanced (23.4 ± 3.2 min, *p* = .034) course compared to the beginners course (27.2 ± 3.0 min). There were no statistically significant differences between the intermediate and advanced groups (*p* = .989).

In our enhanced one-way ANOVA guide, we show you how to write up the results from your assumptions tests, one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc results if you need to report this in a dissertation/thesis, assignment or research report. We do this using the Harvard and APA styles (see here). It is also worth noting that in addition to reporting the results from your assumptions, one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test, you are increasingly expected to report "effect sizes". Whilst there are many different ways you can do this, we show you how to calculate from your SPSS results in our enhanced one-way ANOVA guide. Effect sizes are important because whilst the one-way ANOVA tells you whether differences between group means are "real" (i.e., different in the population), it does not tell you the "size" of the difference. Providing the effect size in your results helps to overcome this limitation. You can learn more about our enhanced one-way ANOVA guide here, or our enhanced content in general here.